Aug 22, 2023
Lawmakers and regulators are increasingly scrutinizing whether AI hiring tools unintentionally perpetuate bias. While these tools can streamline hiring processes, they may pose a compliance risk if they discriminate against certain candidates.
From basic computer screening to advanced AI, various tools are used to evaluate employment candidates. These include resume scanners, employee monitoring software, virtual assistants, video technologies and job-fit algorithms that assess candidates' potential success in certain positions.
However, these tools can introduce discrimination into the hiring process, which is why legislators at the federal, state and local levels are focusing on AI in employment. Although there is no consensus on what constitutes AI and how it contributes to discrimination in hiring, upcoming laws will aim to address these concerns.
Starting in April, New York City employers are banned from using AI in employment decisions, unless they take affirmative steps to mitigate potential bias. This includes conducting a bias audit of the AI tool, making the tool publicly available and notifying job candidates about its use. Candidates or employees must also be allowed to request alternative evaluation processes if needed.
What is a bias audit?
A bias audit involves having a person or group not involved in developing or using the AI tool review it for potential bias. Further details on what this entails are expected. A main concern is that the AI tool might significantly impact or replace discretionary employment decisions, such as overruling human decision-making.
In these instances, the bias audit must calculate the selection rate for each race or ethnicity and sex category. Then, it must be reported to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, where the impact ratio for each category will be calculated. This involves dividing the selection rate by the rate of the most selected category. From there, the average score of individuals in a given category will be compared to the value of the highest-scoring category.
Government responses to AI
Various government bodies are scrutinizing the use of AI and automated tools in employment decision-making. The EEOC has issued technical guidance, warning employers that the use of these tools could violate disability protections under the Americans with Disability Act.
The Department of Commerce has appointed 27 members to the National Advisory Committee, which is the group that oversees AI. The White House has released a blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, which includes provisions related to employment decisions using AI tools.
The Federal Trade Commission has also issued reports expressing concerns about the use of AI and automated tools in decision-making without human review. The EEOC has issued guidance on the use of AI to assess job applicants and employees with regard to ADA protections. Two pending federal bills would require the FTC to mandate impact assessments of automated hiring systems and algorithm usage.
Several states are taking action
California is proposing draft revisions to expand existing discrimination and employment laws that are related to liability risks for employers and vendors selling or administering automated hiring tools that leverage AI. Colorado, Vermont and Washington have created task forces to study AI. And Illinois and Maryland have enacted laws regulating the tools to some extent, though not as comprehensively as New York City.
When it comes to using AI in hiring, there are a few things to keep in mind. The definition of AI can be broad and unclear. It's important to understand what constitutes AI use in an automated hiring tool, and your legal counsel can help with this assessment. When using automated hiring decision tools, consider data retention and work with third-party vendors to ensure compliance with any new laws or regulations. Be prepared to address any implementation issues.
Although automated employment decision tools have the potential to improve efficiency, the use of these tools in employment decision-making will soon require transparency and accountability, as well as clear standards for auditing the processes.
Sep 25, 2025
The Social Security Fairness Act repeals two long-standing rules that reduced Social Security benefits for many government and public sector workers. Read through to learn more about the act and whether these changes affect you.
Sep 24, 2025
Congratulations! You've finally completed the demanding hiring process and you've made the right hire. You are now ready to welcome a new member to the team. Read through for some pro tips on best onboarding practices for the first day at work and beyond.
Sep 23, 2025
Are you curious about the idea of a streamlined payroll process? It's a great way to make sure your entire payroll department is on the same page and operating with the same standards in mind. Read through for insights into the best payroll practices.
Sep 22, 2025
When reimbursing employees for work-related expenses, are you using an accountable plan or a nonaccountable one? The difference affects how you report the payments and how your employee is taxed. Read through to learn the IRS rules and how to stay compliant.
Aug 29, 2025
Once, employees approaching retirement age could look forward to a long, relaxing post-work life. For much of the 55+ crowd, this is no longer the case, with many forestalling retirement for as long as possible. Read through for advice on employing silver workers in your organization.
Aug 28, 2025
For any company to treat their employees with respect and fairness, it needs to have a transparent pay equity policy in place that is shared with all employees. Read through to understand why creating pay equity is beneficial to your organization.
More News & Press can be found in our Archive.
