Aug 22, 2023
Lawmakers and regulators are increasingly scrutinizing whether AI hiring tools unintentionally perpetuate bias. While these tools can streamline hiring processes, they may pose a compliance risk if they discriminate against certain candidates.
From basic computer screening to advanced AI, various tools are used to evaluate employment candidates. These include resume scanners, employee monitoring software, virtual assistants, video technologies and job-fit algorithms that assess candidates' potential success in certain positions.
However, these tools can introduce discrimination into the hiring process, which is why legislators at the federal, state and local levels are focusing on AI in employment. Although there is no consensus on what constitutes AI and how it contributes to discrimination in hiring, upcoming laws will aim to address these concerns.
Starting in April, New York City employers are banned from using AI in employment decisions, unless they take affirmative steps to mitigate potential bias. This includes conducting a bias audit of the AI tool, making the tool publicly available and notifying job candidates about its use. Candidates or employees must also be allowed to request alternative evaluation processes if needed.
What is a bias audit?
A bias audit involves having a person or group not involved in developing or using the AI tool review it for potential bias. Further details on what this entails are expected. A main concern is that the AI tool might significantly impact or replace discretionary employment decisions, such as overruling human decision-making.
In these instances, the bias audit must calculate the selection rate for each race or ethnicity and sex category. Then, it must be reported to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, where the impact ratio for each category will be calculated. This involves dividing the selection rate by the rate of the most selected category. From there, the average score of individuals in a given category will be compared to the value of the highest-scoring category.
Government responses to AI
Various government bodies are scrutinizing the use of AI and automated tools in employment decision-making. The EEOC has issued technical guidance, warning employers that the use of these tools could violate disability protections under the Americans with Disability Act.
The Department of Commerce has appointed 27 members to the National Advisory Committee, which is the group that oversees AI. The White House has released a blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, which includes provisions related to employment decisions using AI tools.
The Federal Trade Commission has also issued reports expressing concerns about the use of AI and automated tools in decision-making without human review. The EEOC has issued guidance on the use of AI to assess job applicants and employees with regard to ADA protections. Two pending federal bills would require the FTC to mandate impact assessments of automated hiring systems and algorithm usage.
Several states are taking action
California is proposing draft revisions to expand existing discrimination and employment laws that are related to liability risks for employers and vendors selling or administering automated hiring tools that leverage AI. Colorado, Vermont and Washington have created task forces to study AI. And Illinois and Maryland have enacted laws regulating the tools to some extent, though not as comprehensively as New York City.
When it comes to using AI in hiring, there are a few things to keep in mind. The definition of AI can be broad and unclear. It's important to understand what constitutes AI use in an automated hiring tool, and your legal counsel can help with this assessment. When using automated hiring decision tools, consider data retention and work with third-party vendors to ensure compliance with any new laws or regulations. Be prepared to address any implementation issues.
Although automated employment decision tools have the potential to improve efficiency, the use of these tools in employment decision-making will soon require transparency and accountability, as well as clear standards for auditing the processes.
Jul 31, 2025
Employers conduct exit interviews with departing employees during the final days of offboarding. If done right, these interviews can be a source of valuable information to help the company improve.
Jul 30, 2025
One of the most important ways for an employee to feel valued by their company is to receive a salary increase. This also helps with retention! Read through for ideas on deciding how much of a salary increase should be awarded to your employees.
Jul 29, 2025
Business owners lose about $50 million a year to employee theft and fraud, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Read through for a glimpse at some of the many ways employees could be stealing from you.
Jul 28, 2025
The recently passed law has a lot of complex provisions, which have led to a lot of misinformation! Fortunately, the IRS has just published a guide to many of the new rules. Read through to read about them, so you can discuss them with your tax advisor.
Jul 03, 2025
When you provide workers with additional benefits on top of their regular pay, some may be taxable. As the rules can get complicated, it pays to familiarize yourself with the requirements. Read through for an overview of which benefits are taxable.
Jul 02, 2025
Disputes over unpaid work time often arise from tasks performed outside official hours — for example, answering emails, traveling between jobsites or changing into work clothes. Employers must understand when these activities count as compensable work. Read through to learn how exempt and nonexempt statuses affect wage obligations.
More News & Press can be found in our Archive.
